FDA Opens ‘Pandora’s Box’ by Approving Food From Clones For Sale

Lipitor Online Buy Lipitor Erythromycin Online Buy Coumadin Penisole Online Buy Phentrimine Zelnorm Online Buy Elavil Flomax Online Buy Aldactone

the Center for Food Safety (CFS) condemned the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) irresponsible determination that milk and meat from cloned animals are safe for sale to the public.  In addition, the FDA is requiring no tracking system for clones or labeling of products produced from clones or their offspring.  This action comes at a time when the U.S. Senate has voted twice to delay FDA’s decision on cloned animals until additional safety and economic studies can be completed by the National Academy of Sciences and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). ”The FDA’s bullheaded action today disregards the will of the public and the Senate - and opens a literal Pandora’s Box,” said Andrew Kimbrell, CFS Executive Director. “FDA based their decision on an incomplete and flawed review that relies on studies supplied by cloning companies that want to force cloning technology on American consumers.  FDA’s action has placed the interests of a handful of biotech firms above those of the public they are charged with protecting.”

With FDA’s release of their controversial risk assessment today, CFS joins dozens of other food industry, consumer, and animal welfare groups, as well as federal lawmakers in calling for swift action on the part of Congress to pass the 2007 Farm Bill containing  provisions delaying FDA’s release of clones into the food supply.  The Farm Bill currently contains an amendment, advanced by Senator Barbara A. Mikulski (D-MD.) and co-sponsored by Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), requiring a rigorous and careful review of the human health and economic impacts of allowing clones food into America’s food supply.  The Senate overwhelmingly passed the bill by a vote of 79 to 14.

“The passage of this bill with the Mikulski-Specter amendment sends a strong message that the FDA has failed the public again by taking an inadequate and half-baked look at the safety of food products from cloned animals and their offspring,” said Joseph Mendelson, CFS Legal Director. “The FDA’s cavalier approach to cloned food and its potential impacts calls for the remedy of a truly rigorous scientific assessment, and Congress has now repeatedly called for such action.”

The Farm Bill amendment addresses the gaps and inadequacies of the FDA’s current risk assessment, and would go into effect before any food products from clones are marketed.  The Farm Bill also directs the USDA to examine consumer acceptance of cloned foods and the likely impacts they could have on domestic and international markets. (For more information on this amendment, go to: http://mikulski.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=289130).

Additionally, the FDA is today issuing a guidance document for food producers; It fails to require any special procedures for tracking or handling food products from clones.  It also fails to require labeling of any kind on food products from clones or their offspring, which deprives consumers of their right to know about the origins of their food.

Recently, two cloning companies - Viagen and Trans Ova, proposed the creation of a voluntary cloning registry program.  While they advanced claims that the registry would provide consumer protection and transparency without regulation, clones and their progeny will still be dispersed through the food system without any tracking or labeling.

“The cloning industry’s proposal is simply another attempt to force cloned milk and meat on consumers and the dairy industry by giving the public phony assurances,” said Mendelson.  “The proposal neither provides new studies on the safety of clones nor protects the consumers’ right to know whether their food or dairy contains products from clones.  Once clones are released into America’s food supply without any traceability requirements, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to recall them.”

Recent opinion polls show the majority of Americans do not want milk or meat from cloned animals in their food.  A December 2006 poll by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology found that nearly two-thirds of U.S. consumers were uncomfortable with animal cloning.  A national survey conducted this year by Consumers Union found that 89 percent of Americans want to see cloned foods labeled, while 69 percent said that they have concerns about cloned meat and dairy products in the food supply.  A recent Gallup Poll reported that more than 60 percent of Americans believe that it is immoral to clone animals, while the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology found that a similar percentage say that, despite FDA approval, they won’t buy milk from cloned animals.

In its risk assessment of cloned food, the FDA claims to have evaluated extensive peer reviewed safety studies to support its conclusion, yet a recent report issued by CFS, Not Ready for Prime Time, shows the assessment only references three peer-reviewed food safety studies, all of which focus on the narrow issue of milk from cloned cows.  What is even more disturbing is that these studies were partially funded by the same biotech firms that produce clones for profit. 

For an executive summary of the Center for Food Safety’s report, please visit http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/NotReadyForPrimeTime_ExecSummary.pdf

Visit http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/pubs/FDA_Cloning_RAreview_Report_FINAL.pdf for the full report.

=========================================================

From Friends of the Earth USA:

Today, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lifted a ban on selling meat and dairy products coming from cloned animals.

Tell grocers you aren’t buying it! Tell them you’ll stop shopping at stores that can’t promise not to sell such products.

The FDA has buckled to big biotech and agro-business despite more than 150,000 public comments opposing the lifting of the ban, and amendments to the federal Farm Bill and Omnibus Appropriations Bill calling for more research before lifting the ban.

Genetically speaking, you meat eaters could eat burgers from the same cow for years. 

Don’t eat meat? We still think this issue will interest you, given the risks we take by introducing cloned animals into our food system and ecosystem.

It is too late to stop the FDA from permitting the sale of food from cloned animals, and there are no labeling requirements either, which is why we need to make grocery stores pay a price for choosing to sell it.

Starting today, Friends of the Earth is collecting petition signatures from the public that we will deliver to all the major grocery stores — and provide copies to Congress and the FDA. The text of the petition:

I urge you to declare that your grocery stores will not sell food from cloned animals. I plan to shop only at stores that can make such a guarantee.

Sign the petition now.

The FDA claims that cloned animals and their offspring are safe for us to eat, yet studies used by the FDA are incomplete.Cloned animals have a much higher rate of genetic abnormalities than animals that reproduce naturally. Most cloned animals die immediately after birth because the intricacies of the cloning process are still not well understood. Dolly, the first cloned sheep, died only six years after her birth of premature arthritis and lung disease.|

Tell grocers that you aren’t buying it!Gillian Madill
Genetic Technologies Campaigner
Friends of the Earth


Click here to sign the petition:

http://www.FoE.org/No_Food_From_Cloned_Animals

=============================================================

TITLE:  EFSA LAUNCHES ITS DRAFT OPINION ON ANIMAL CLONING FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION SOURCE: European Food Safety Authority, Italy

AUTHOR: Press Release

URL:    http://efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178676923092.htm

DATE:   11.01.2008

EFSA is launching a public consultation on its draft scientific opinion on the implications of animal cloning on food safety, animal health and welfare and the environment. The work follows a request from the European Commission (EC) to EFSA for advice on this issue in February 2007. EFSA’s opinion will help inform consideration of any future EU measures[1] in relation to animal clones and products obtained from these animals[2].

EFSA’s Scientific Committee (SC)[3], which includes the chairs of all of EFSA’s Panels, has led this work as it is a multi-disciplinary issue relevant to a number of the Panels’ respective areas of expertise. They have been assisted by a Working Group of scientists with relevant expertise to consider the different aspects of the Commission’s request.

Some of the key conclusions of the draft opinion include:

- Although death and disease rates of clones are significantly higher than those observed in conventionally reproduced animals, healthy clones and their offspring indicate that somatic cell nucleus transfer (SCNT)[4] can be successfully used as a reproductive technique in cattle and pigs. Based on a number of parameters including physiological and clinical ones, healthy clones and healthy offspring do not show any significant differences from their conventional counterparts.

- The health and welfare of a significant proportion of clones have been found to be adversely affected. The proportion of unhealthy clones is likely to decrease as the technology improves.

- Food products obtained from healthy cattle and pig clones and their offspring, i.e., meat and milk, are within the normal range with respect to the compositionand nutritional valueof similar products obtained from conventionally bred animals. In view of these findings, and assuming that unhealthy clones are removed from entering the food chain as is the case with conventionally bred animals, it is very unlikely that any difference exists in terms of food safety between food products originating from clones and their progeny compared with those derived from conventionally bred animals.

- No environmental impact is foreseen as a result of animal cloning, but there is only limited data available.

This draft opinion acknowledges that SCNT is a relatively new technology and the available data for risk assessment are limited. Most studies have been of small sample size and the currently available data only allow for an assessment of cattle and pig clones and their progeny. In addition, as SCNT is a developing technology, information on animals reared and remaining alive for considerable periods of time is limited. Also, the current welfare assessment is largely based on interpretation of limited data.

EFSA is launching a consultation on its draft opinion. Comments can be submitted until 25 February 2008. Contributions to the consultation can be made via the EFSA website: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178676922939.htm. EFSA will also hold a stakeholder meeting in February and engage in consultation with EU Member States (MS) through its Advisory Forum.

The Working Group and the SC will consider the comments and contributions made during the consultation. It is likely that the SC will be able to then consider a revised draft of the opinion for possible adoption at its April meeting and subsequent publication in May 2008.

The EC has also asked for an opinion from the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies which will address ethical issues around this issue. This will complement EFSA’s work as EFSA does not have a mandate to consider ethical, moral or other societal issues beyond its scientific remit.

The full text of the opinion is available on the public consultation page on the EFSA website at:

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178676922939.htm

Useful links:

Frequently Asked Questions

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_AnimalCloningFAQs.htm

Request letter from European commission to EFSA on the implications of animal cloning

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620789452.htm

European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies

http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm

[1] At present cloning is not a commercial practice in Europe and there is no specific authorisation procedure for food products from cloned animals in the EU.

[2] This draft opinion addresses cloning in the context of pigs and cattle only, as these are the two species of animals where adequate data was available

[3] EFSA’s Scientific Committee comprises the 9 chairs of EFSA’s Scientific Panels which cover all areas of EFSA’s mandate. It also includes six additional independent scientists. Appointments are made on the basis of proven scientific excellence following an open call for applications and a rigorous selection procedure.

[4] SCNT, somatic cell nucleus transfer, a technique where a genetic copy of an animal is produced by replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized ovum with the nucleus of a body (somatic) cell from the animal to form an embryo. The embryo is then transferred to a surrogate dam where it then develops until birth.

Leave a Comment »

Comments RSS 2.0

no comments yet - be the first?


Captcha

Enter the letters you see above.

« D.C. Appellate Court Holds GITMO Prisoners are “Non-Persons” and Throws out Their Suit // GE Tree Trial Breach Shows Institutional Contradictions »


FireStats icon Powered by FireStats